Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 4489 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
QA
YI YM YE

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 09BRASILIA1370, NUCLEAR FUEL BANKS - BRAZIL THINKS THE IDEA IS PREMATURE

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #09BRASILIA1370.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
09BRASILIA1370 2009-11-27 09:09 2011-02-11 00:12 UNCLASSIFIED//FOR OFFICIAL USE ONLY Embassy Brasilia
VZCZCXRO1421
OO RUEHRG
DE RUEHBR #1370 3310945
ZNR UUUUU ZZH
O 270945Z NOV 09
FM AMEMBASSY BRASILIA
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC IMMEDIATE 5487
INFO RUEHRI/AMCONSUL RIO DE JANEIRO 0067
RUEHRG/AMCONSUL RECIFE 0139
RUEHUNV/USMISSION UNVIE VIENNA 0207
RHEBAAA/DEPT OF ENERGY WASHDC
RUEHII/VIENNA IAEA POSTS COLLECTIVE
UNCLAS BRASILIA 001370 
 
SENSITIVE 
 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT FOR ISN/NESS - M.HUMPHREY 
 
E.O. 12958: N/A 
TAGS: AORC KNNP IAEA ENRG TRGY RS BR
SUBJECT: NUCLEAR FUEL BANKS - BRAZIL THINKS THE IDEA IS PREMATURE 
FOR DECISION, BUT MOST LIKELY WILL ABSTAIN 

REF: A) STATE 120282, 
B) STATE 117710, 
C) BRASILIA 1141 

(U) THIS CABLE IS SENSITIVE BUT UNCLASSIFIED AND NOT FOR INTERNET DISTRIBUTION. 

1. (SBU) On November 25, Science Counselor discussed the proposal for establishing a nuclear fuel bank (per REFTELS B and C) with the Director of Brazil's Ministry of External Relations' (MRE) Department of Disarmament and Sensitive Technologies, Minister Santiago Mourao. As indicated in REFTEL C, the Government of Brazil (GOB) has interest in discussing the proposal for a nuclear fuel bank at the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), but at this time Brazil still has various questions it would like to see clarified. 

3. (SBU) Mourao said that it was "premature" for the IAEA to be taking a decision on the Russian proposal at the upcoming Board of Governors (BOG) meeting. He said that the Brazilian Ambassador in Vienna had raised their concerns during the recent meeting in Vienna on the proposal. Brazil was particularly interested in knowing how would a nuclear fuel bank work, when and under what circumstances could a country obtain access, and what were the criteria for a country to participate in the program. 

4. (SBU) A small working group, including Brazil and also some countries that are likely participants in such a program (for example, Malaysia), should be set up to look more in depth at the question, suggested Mourao. He added that their Ambassador in Vienna had been "unleashed" and so had ample authority to handle this issue from Vienna. 

5. (SBU) COMMENT. If a vote comes up at this IAEA BOG, Brazil would most likely not vote in favor. Mourao was unclear about whether they would abstain or vote against. However, the MRE generally does not like to break consensus or be seen as the country blocking a decision, unless the question is of vital interest. Post believes that if the majority of member states at the IAEA BOG are in favor of the proposal, then Brazil will most likely abstain. END COMMENT. 

JACKSON