Keep Us Strong WikiLeaks logo

Currently released so far... 4489 / 251,287

Articles

Browse latest releases

Browse by creation date

Browse by origin

A B C D F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W Y Z

Browse by tag

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O P Q R S T U V W X Y Z
QA
YI YM YE

Browse by classification

Community resources

courage is contagious

Viewing cable 08LONDON2070, UK DOESN'T EXPECT STRONG NEW BURMA SANCTIONS FROM

If you are new to these pages, please read an introduction on the structure of a cable as well as how to discuss them with others. See also the FAQs

Understanding cables
Every cable message consists of three parts:
  • The top box shows each cables unique reference number, when and by whom it originally was sent, and what its initial classification was.
  • The middle box contains the header information that is associated with the cable. It includes information about the receiver(s) as well as a general subject.
  • The bottom box presents the body of the cable. The opening can contain a more specific subject, references to other cables (browse by origin to find them) or additional comment. This is followed by the main contents of the cable: a summary, a collection of specific topics and a comment section.
To understand the justification used for the classification of each cable, please use this WikiSource article as reference.

Discussing cables
If you find meaningful or important information in a cable, please link directly to its unique reference number. Linking to a specific paragraph in the body of a cable is also possible by copying the appropriate link (to be found at theparagraph symbol). Please mark messages for social networking services like Twitter with the hash tags #cablegate and a hash containing the reference ID e.g. #08LONDON2070.
Reference ID Created Released Classification Origin
08LONDON2070 2008-08-08 09:09 2011-02-04 21:09 CONFIDENTIAL//NOFORN Embassy London
VZCZCXRO6277
PP RUEHFL RUEHKW RUEHLA RUEHROV RUEHSR
DE RUEHLO #2070 2210926
ZNY CCCCC ZZH
P 080926Z AUG 08
FM AMEMBASSY LONDON
TO RUEHC/SECSTATE WASHDC PRIORITY 9445
INFO RUEHZL/EUROPEAN POLITICAL COLLECTIVE PRIORITY
RUEHBJ/AMEMBASSY BEIJING PRIORITY 1058
RUEHBY/AMEMBASSY CANBERRA PRIORITY 0796
RUEHNE/AMEMBASSY NEW DELHI PRIORITY 0801
RUEHNY/AMEMBASSY OSLO PRIORITY 0757
RUEHOT/AMEMBASSY OTTAWA PRIORITY 1163
RUEHUL/AMEMBASSY SEOUL PRIORITY 0555
RUEHKO/AMEMBASSY TOKYO PRIORITY 1162
RUEHWL/AMEMBASSY WELLINGTON PRIORITY 0252
RUEATRS/DEPT OF TREASURY WASHDC PRIORITY
C O N F I D E N T I A L LONDON 002070 
 
NOFORN 
SIPDIS 
 
DEPT PASS TO EAP/MLS LSCHEIBE 
 
E.O. 12958: DECL: 08/07/2018 
TAGS: PGOV ETRD UK BM
SUBJECT: UK DOESN'T EXPECT STRONG NEW BURMA SANCTIONS FROM 
EU 
 
REF: SECSTATE 83719 
 
Classified By: A/ECON MARK C. JOHNSON FOR REASONS 1.4 (B) AND (D)  1. (C/NF) 

Summary: The UK agrees with U.S. desires to maintain pressure on the Burma regime, but claims other EU Member States are not as eager to increase sanctions - particularly financial ones.  FCO is preparing a brief policy paper to address steps forward, which it intends to share with us and the French. End Summary  

2. (C/NF) The international community must continue to apply pressure on the Junta in Burma, Nigel Boud, Head of Burma and Mekong Team, and Stephen McCormick, Head of International Organization Sanctions Unit, UK Foreign Office told us on August 7.  The UK is fully in agreement with the U.S. that we must not weaken our approach to the Burmese leadership.  Boud and McCormick described the EU's Burma sanctions as the strongest of all the EU's autonomous sanctions, but said they were constrained in going much further by their EU partners. Boud said some EU Member States were not eager to increase sanctions following the cyclone, while others - who are traditionally skeptical of using sanctions - were using the cyclone as an excuse to try and weaken the current package. Boud and McCormick applauded the U.S. measures and were eager to delve into the details of how the Lantos JADE Act addresses the third-country transfer and sale of jade or rubies - an issue of great importance to UK-based pro-democracy lobbyists.  The EU has strict customs rules which bind all Member States to a rigid interpretation of "country of origin", and there are no current plans to try and modify the rules, Boud said.  The FCO officials were also interested in following USG implementation of the legislation, noting that it is very hard to enforce monitoring of third country transfers.  

3. (C/NF) HMG is finishing up a brief policy outline covering overall relations with Burma, sanctions, treatment of senior officials, etc. which it will share with the USG and France in the next few days.  The goal is to use this paper, and consultations over the next six months, for the P3 to drive the debate on Burma.  Towards that end, FCO greatly appreciated ideas from Treasury's OFAC a few months ago and has worked them into EU and French thinking.  The UK will conduct extensive bilateral discussions with the French on the EU's path forward.  

EU POSITIONS ------------  

4. (C/NF) According to Boud and McCormick, in addition to the UK, the strong players on this issue are the Nordics - led by a forceful Danish position and then the Swedes and Finns, as well as the Czechs, Dutch and a strong and effective Irish approach.  The French are in the middle, constrained primarily by their Total investments and concerns that financial sanctions could impact all of Total's operations in Burma.  The French political level (Ministers) are publicly very committed and ready to act, while the official French position within EU meetings is that the French are not convinced that sanctions (at least financial ones) are the best tool, according to Boud.  At the far end opposing sanctions are the Germans and Austrians - for legalistic reasons - and the Mediterraneans (Italy, Portugal), who are philosophically reluctant to believe that sanctions can have an impact.  Boud mentioned that during recent meetings in Berlin the Germans pushed to "incentivize" Burma, but when the UK tried to channel that desire into increased EU humanitarian aid, it was rebuffed.  According to Boud, the same countries who like the incentive idea are the ones with the smallest aid budgets.  Finally, Boud mentioned that many EU countries are feeling the pressure of "sanctions fatigue" due to the Zimbabwe sanctions, considering that they have already sacrificed some business interests.  Visit London's Classified Website: XXXXXXXXXXXX 
TUTTLE